Third-Party Review & Verification Requirements

Third-party verification ensures credibility and compliance with relevant standards for Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs), Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), and Product Carbon Footprints (PCFs).

Verification Requirements by Type

Declaration Type

Key StandardsVerification Requirements

LCA Study

ISO 14040/14044
  • Critical review required for comparative assertions
  • Independent external expert or panel
  • Review of methodology, data, and interpretation

EPD

ISO 14025, EN 15804
  • Mandatory third-party verification
  • Accredited verification body
  • PCR compliance verification

PCF

ISO 14067, GHG Protocol
  • Optional but recommended verification
  • Independent third-party verifier
  • Focus on GHG emissions calculations

 

 

Verifier Qualifications

Required Competencies

  • Understanding of relevant standards and methodologies
  • Experience with LCA software and databases
  • Sector-specific knowledge
  • Verification process expertise
  • Professional certification (where applicable)

Independence Requirements

  • No involvement in conducting the assessment
  • No conflict of interest with the organization
  • No bias regarding the product or service
  • Financial independence from the study outcome

Verification Process

Documentation ReviewData VerificationCalculation CheckFinal Verification

Documentation Review

Key Elements:

  • Goal and scope definition
  • Functional unit appropriateness
  • System boundary completeness
  • Allocation procedures
  • Data quality requirements
  • Calculation methodologies
  • Assumptions and limitations

Data Verification

Verification Points:

  • Primary data accuracy
  • Secondary data appropriateness
  • Data quality compliance
  • Data source documentation
  • Temporal and geographic relevance
  • Completeness check

Calculation Check

Review Areas:

  • Mathematical accuracy
  • Unit conversions
  • Emission factor applications
  • Allocation calculations
  • Impact assessment methods
  • Uncertainty analysis

Common Issues and Solutions

Issue

Solution

Incomplete documentation

Provide detailed methodology report and data inventory

Data gaps

Document and justify proxy data or conservative estimates

Calculation errors

Implement quality control checks and validation procedures

Inconsistent methods

Develop and follow standardized calculation procedures

Preparing for Verification

  • Organize documentation systematically
  • Conduct internal review before verification
  • Prepare data evidence packages
  • Document calculation methodologies clearly
  • Maintain audit trail of decisions and changes
  • Have key personnel available for questions

Best Practices for Successful Verification:

  • Start preparation early in the assessment process
  • Maintain clear documentation throughout
  • Address verification findings promptly
  • Document all verification-related communications
  • Implement recommendations for improvement

Post-Verification Requirements

  • Maintain verified documentation
  • Implement any required changes
  • Monitor and record significant changes
  • Plan for regular updates and re-verification
  • Communicate verification status appropriately

Was this article helpful?