Handling Incomplete Emission Factors: Challenges and Best Practices

Greenhouse gas accountants often encounter emission factors that provide incomplete information, either listing only certain gases or presenting aggregated CO₂e values. Understanding how to handle these situations and their limitations is crucial for accurate accounting.

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: CO₂e Only

Emission factor given as: 2.5 kg CO₂e per unit

Scenario 2: Limited GHGs

Emission factor lists only CO₂ and CH₄, omitting N₂O and other gases

Scenario 3: Unknown Base Year

CO₂e values without specification of which IPCC AR GWP values were used

Best Practices for Handling Incomplete Factors

1. Documentation and Transparency

  • Clearly document all assumptions and limitations
  • State which gases are included and which are potentially missing
  • Record the source and year of emission factors
  • Note any uncertainty ranges if available

2. Hierarchical Approach

  • First Choice: Seek more complete emission factors from authoritative sources
  • Second Choice: Use proxy data from similar processes or technologies
  • Third Choice: Apply conservative estimates based on available data
  • Last Resort: Use incomplete factors with clear documentation of limitations

 

3. Conservative Estimation

When using incomplete factors, consider:

  • Using upper-bound estimates when uncertainty exists
  • Including additional margin for potentially missing gases
  • Applying industry-specific adjustment factors when available

Limitations and Risks

Key Limitations:

  • Underestimation Risk: Missing gases may lead to underreporting of total emissions
  • Temporal Inconsistency: Unknown base year GWPs may cause comparison issues
  • Incomplete Impact Assessment: Missing gases may affect other impact categories
  • Reduced Accuracy: Aggregated CO₂e values mask individual gas contributions

Specific Cases and Solutions

When Only CO₂e is Provided

Steps to Take:

  1. Verify which GWP values were used (AR4, AR5, etc.)
  2. Document if this information is unavailable
  3. Consider sensitivity analysis with different GWP sets
  4. Flag for future updates when better data becomes available

When Only Major GHGs are Listed

Steps to Take:

  1. Assess typical contribution of missing gases for similar processes
  2. Apply conservative uplift factors if appropriate
  3. Document rationale for any adjustments made
  4. Consider sector-specific guidance

Quality Assurance Recommendations

Data Quality Assessment

  • Evaluate technological representativeness
  • Check temporal validity
  • Assess geographical relevance
  • Review completeness of scope

Uncertainty Management

  • Quantify uncertainty ranges where possible
  • Use sensitivity analysis for key assumptions
  • Consider multiple scenarios
  • Document confidence levels

Mitigation Strategies

To minimize the impact of incomplete emission factors:

  • Develop a data improvement plan
  • Prioritize major emission sources for detailed analysis
  • Establish regular review and update procedures
  • Build relationships with suppliers for better data access
  • Participate in industry initiatives for factor development

Key Takeaway: When working with incomplete emission factors, prioritize transparency, conservative estimation, and continuous improvement. Always document limitations and assumptions, and update calculations when better data becomes available.


 

Was this article helpful?